Mobile Menu - OpenMobile Menu - Closed

Top Budget Democrats Yarmuth & Sanders Urge Administration Not to Impound Funding

Aug 19, 2019
Yarmuth & Sanders: Law Requires Funding to Be Spent as Congress Intended

Washington, D.C. – Top Democratic budget leaders in the House and Senate sent a letter to the Trump Administration today expressing concerns over a reported rescission package that would cancel more than $4 billion in previously appropriated funding. Congressman John Yarmuth (KY-03) Chairman of the House Budget Committee, and Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Ranking Member of the Senate Budget Committee, warn that this attempt by the White House to circumvent Congress’s constitutional power of the purse violates our nation’s separation of powers and runs afoul of a legal opinion issued last year by the Government Accountability Office (GAO).

 In a letter to Mick Mulvaney, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), the lawmakers wrote, “We strongly urge the Administration to refrain from sending a rescission message to the Congress; however, in the event the Administration submits such a message, it must take measures to ensure that the affected funds will be prudently obligated in the event the Congress does not approve the rescission, as required by law.”

The letter urges the administration to respect Congress’s constitutional authority and to comply with appropriations law and the Impoundment Control Act (ICA).

“To withhold these funds until they can no longer be prudently obligated or until they expire, in the absence of Congressional approval of the rescission, would violate the ICA and flout an important constitutional check,” Yarmuth and Sanders wrote. “ We trust that you will comply with the law and respect the constitutional role of the Congress to remain at the center of funding decisions.”

The full text of the letter is below. A PDF copy is available here.

 

August 19, 2019

The Honorable Mick Mulvaney

Director

Office of Management and Budget

725 17th Street, NW

Washington, DC 20503

 

Dear Director Mulvaney:

We write to express our profound concern regarding the Administration’s reported plan to submit a rescission request to the Congress just a few weeks before the end of the fiscal year.

Under the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (ICA), the President may submit a special message proposing the rescission of budget authority and may withhold funds from obligation for a period of 45 calendar days of continuous session following transmission of the special message.  In keeping with Congress’s constitutional power of the purse, however, such funding must be released absent approval by Congress within the 45-day period.  Specifically, section 1012(b) of the ICA states:

Any amount of budget authority proposed to be rescinded or that is to be reserved as set forth in such special message shall be made available for obligation unless, within the prescribed 45-day period, the Congress has completed action on a rescission bill rescinding all or part of the amount proposed to be rescinded or that is to be reserved.

Submitting a rescissions request and withholding funds from obligation this late in the fiscal year could result in funding being withheld through its expiration date.  In December 2018, at the request of the House Budget Committee, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a legal opinion that addressed this circumstance.  GAO found that “the ICA does not permit the withholding of funds through their date of expiration.”  Further, GAO determined that absent Congressional action to rescind the funds,

amounts proposed for rescission must be made available for prudent obligation before the amounts expire, even where the 45-day period for congressional consideration provided in the ICA approaches or spans the date on which funds would expire: the requirement to make amounts available for obligation in this situation prevails over the privilege to temporarily withhold the amounts.

The authority provided by the ICA to the Executive Branch to withhold funds temporarily is necessarily limited.  The GAO opinion states:

It would be an abuse of this limited authority and an interference with Congress’s constitutional prerogatives if a President were to time the withholding of expiring budget authority to effectively alter the time period that the budget authority is available for obligation from the time period established by Congress in duly enacted appropriations legislation.

As the chairman and ranking member of the respective House and Senate committees with jurisdiction over the Impoundment Control Act, we affirm our strong agreement with the legal analysis and conclusions reached by GAO. We strongly urge the Administration to refrain from sending a rescission message to the Congress; however, in the event the Administration submits such a message, it must take measures to ensure that the affected funds will be prudently obligated in the event the Congress does not approve the rescission, as required by law. To withhold these funds until they can no longer be prudently obligated or until they expire, in the absence of Congressional approval of the rescission, would violate the ICA and flout an important constitutional check.  We trust that you will comply with the law and respect the constitutional role of the Congress to remain at the center of funding decisions. 

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Sincerely,

                                             

John Yarmuth                                                                                               Bernard Sanders

Chairman                                                                                                        Ranking Member

House Committee on the Budget                                                     Senate Committee on the Budget